Gering v. State of Florida
Robert Gering |
State of Florida |
1:2019cv22115 |
May 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Beth Bloom |
Lisette M Reid |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document State of Florida. Answer due 8/29/2019. Re: #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Gering. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/15/2019. (rm01) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #6 Order to Show Cause, by State of Florida. (Charest-Turken, Gabrielle) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken on behalf of State of Florida. Attorney Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken added to party State of Florida(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit document request) (Charest-Turken, Gabrielle) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254 on or before forty-five days from the date of this order the respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/31/2019. (rm01) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Gering. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit/Declaration in Support)(kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (kpe) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Robert Gering.(kpe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gering v. State of Florida | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of Florida | |
Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Miami-Dade/Monroe |
Represented By: | Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Gering | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.