Dudley v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
John Dudley |
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC |
1:2019cv22341 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
Jonathan Goodman |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Administrative Order Closing Case. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (kou) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement Pending by John Dudley (Parmer, Geoffrey) |
Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, filed by John Dudley.(Parmer, Geoffrey) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by John Dudley (Parmer, Geoffrey) |
Filing 6 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by John Dudley (Parmer, Geoffrey) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by John Dudley. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC served on 6/11/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. (Parmer, Geoffrey) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters; Notice re Joint Motions; Expedited Service Deadline 8/6/2019. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 6/7/2019. See attached document for full details. (kou) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (amb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11710440, filed by John Dudley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Parmer, Geoffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dudley v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Dudley | |
Represented By: | Geoffrey Edward Parmer |
Represented By: | William Peerce Howard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.