Coello v. Ficohsa Express, LLC
Plaintiff: Lesly Coello
Defendant: Ficohsa Express, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv22383
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jose E Martinez
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2019 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ficohsa Express, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Banco Ficohsa, S.A. for Ficohsa Express, LLC (Monk, Jacob)
August 8, 2019 Filing 15 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Lesly Coello (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Proposed Schedule, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's Proposed Schedule)(Hiraldo, Manuel)
August 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Denying As Moot #11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/5/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
August 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Mitchell A. Karlan. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/5/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
August 5, 2019 Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ficohsa Express, LLC, filed by Lesly Coello.(Hiraldo, Manuel)
August 5, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Ficohsa Express, LLC. Responses due by 8/19/2019 (Monk, Jacob)
August 5, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Mitchell A. Karlan of the Law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11873649 by Ficohsa Express, LLC. Responses due by 8/19/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Monk, Jacob)
July 24, 2019 Set Deadlines Per DE 9 Joint Scheduling Report due by 8/8/2019 (vmz)
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Meet and File Joint Scheduling Report, Proposed Order, and Certificates of Interested Parties. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report, proposed order, and certificates of interested parties on or before August 8, 2019. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/24/2019. (ean)
July 23, 2019 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Meet and File Joint Scheduling Report, Proposed Order, and Certificates of Interested Parties by Ficohsa Express, LLC. Responses due by 8/6/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Monk, Jacob)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before August 5, 2019. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 7/8/2019. (ean)
July 5, 2019 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Ficohsa Express, LLC. Attorney Jacob Benjamin Monk added to party Ficohsa Express, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Monk, Jacob)
June 21, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Lesly Coello. Ficohsa Express, LLC served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (Hiraldo, Manuel)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 6/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (dq)
June 10, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ficohsa Express, LLC. (ebz)
June 10, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ficohsa Express, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11716292, filed by Lesly Coello. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Hiraldo, Manuel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coello v. Ficohsa Express, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ficohsa Express, LLC
Represented By: Mitchell A. Karlan
Represented By: Jacob Benjamin Monk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lesly Coello
Represented By: Jordan David Utanski
Represented By: Andrew John Shamis
Represented By: Garrett O. Berg
Represented By: Scott Adam Edelsberg
Represented By: Manuel Santiago Hiraldo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?