Blanco v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Luis Blanco |
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London |
1:2019cv22385 |
June 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Federico A Moreno |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand to: 11th Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade, FL. State Court Case Number: 19-008247-CA-01 (pes) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #3 Motion to Remand to State Court. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: #3 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Notice Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/25/2019. See attached document for full details. (ap00) |
Filing 5 REPORT REGARDING Removal Status by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Alvarez, Daniel) |
Filing 4 Notice of Court Practice in Removal Cases. Report must be filed no later than June 27, 2019. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (ap00) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Notice Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Alvarez, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Composit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet State court civil cover sheet, #6 Complaint, #7 Pleading, #8 Pleading, #9 Pleading, #10 Pleading, #11 Pleading, #12 Pleading, #13 Pleading)(Alvarez, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Blanco v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Luis Blanco | |
Represented By: | Thomas J. Morgan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Underwriters at Lloyd's, London | |
Represented By: | Vincent Paul Beilman, III |
Represented By: | Daniel L Alvarez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.