Navarro v. Gragil Associates, Inc.
| Clasrissa Navarro |
| Gragil Associates, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv23124 |
| July 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER STRIKING #6 IMPROPER SCHEDULING REPORT. As stated in #4 the Court's July 31, 2019 order, the Parties must submit a joint conference report and a joint proposed scheduling order, as required by S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1(b). As part of that filing, the Parties must complete and submit the form attached to the Court's order #4 proposing deadlines. The Parties' report #6 is stricken and the Parties shall comply with the Court's order #4 by September 27, 2019. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/25/2019. (sgi)
|
| Filing 6 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Clasrissa Navarro (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Patti, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Gragil Associates, Inc.. Attorney Charles James McHale, Jr added to party Gragil Associates, Inc. (pty:dft). (McHale, Charles) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters and Notice of Court Practices and Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/31/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Gragil Associates, Inc.. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gragil Associates, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11850883, filed by Clasrissa Navarro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A-Collection Letter)(Hindi, Jibrael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Navarro v. Gragil Associates, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gragil Associates, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Charles James McHale, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clasrissa Navarro | |
| Represented By: | Thomas John Patti, III |
| Represented By: | Jibrael Jarallah Said Hindi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
