FUCHS et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
MARTINE FUCHS and MICHEL FUCHS |
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
1:2019cv23460 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ursula Ungaro |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER OF REFERRAL TO MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL. Amended Pleadings due by 12/13/2019. Discovery due by 2/21/2020. Expert Discovery due by 2/21/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 12/13/2019. All motions including summary judgment motions, motions related to summary judgment motions, Daubert motions and motions related to trial evidence due by 3/13/2020. Joint Pretrial Stipulation due by 3/27/2020. Jury Trial set for 5/26/2020 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro. Calendar Call set for 5/20/2020 01:00 PM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2020 10:30 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 8 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Joint Scheduling Order)(Rolland, Sean) |
Filing 7 Initial Disclosure(s) of Rule 26 Disclosures by MARTINE FUCHS, MICHEL FUCHS (Wisniewski, Brian) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. (Initial Planning and Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2019 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro). (Joint Planning and Scheduling Report due by 10/4/2019). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 9/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2) |
Filing 5 Defendant Scottsdale Insruance Company's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Manzo, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Sean W. Rolland, mailing date August 19, 2019, (cco) |
Filing 3 ORDER Re: #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint). Scottsdale Insurance Company response to the complaint due 8/26/2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 8/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint ) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11913164, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit)(Manzo, Joseph) Modified text on 8/19/2019 (ar2). (No answer/motion to dismiss filed). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.