Echevarria v. United States of America
| Sergio Echevarria |
| United States of America |
| 1:2019cv23482 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Vacate 924(c) Convictions in Light of Davis by Sergio Echevarria. Responses due by 10/21/2019 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taylor, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Reassignment of Assistant Federal Public Defender by Kathleen Elena Handlin Taylor on behalf of Sergio Echevarria. Attorney Michael Caruso terminated.. Attorney Kathleen Elena Handlin Taylor added to party Sergio Echevarria(pty:pla). (Taylor, Kathleen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sean Paul Cronin on behalf of United States of America. Attorney Sean Paul Cronin added to party United States of America(pty:dft). (Cronin, Sean) |
Filing 3
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN LIGHT OF ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'S GRANT RE APPLICATION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE MOTION TO VACATE - 28 U.S.C. 2255 BASED ON RETROACTIVITY OF UNITED STATES V. DAVIS, Attorney Noticing-FPD-MIA for Sergio Echevarria added for Motion Attacking Sentence/Motion to Vacate Sentence (28 USC 2255). On or before forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order, the Federal Public Defender shall file a motion to vacate with supporting memorandum of law, in compliance with the local and federal rules governing such filings, addressing with specificity whether the motion should be GRANTED in light of the Supreme Courts decision in Davis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 8/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) Modified on 10/7/2019 (fbn).
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (vjk) |
| Filing 1 USCA ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUCCESSIVE MOTION (Complaint) to Correct Sentence (2255). NOTE: All further docketing is to be done in the civil case. (Criminal Case # 96-cr-00443-JEM), filed by Sergio Echevarria.(vjk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Echevarria v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sergio Echevarria | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Elena Handlin Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2255 US Attorney |
| Represented By: | Sean Paul Cronin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
