Jackson v. Department of Corrections
| Christopher Jackson |
| Department of Corrections |
| 1:2019cv23706 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Department of Corrections of Filing State's Trial Transcripts (Attachments: #1 Transcripts 1, #2 Transcripts 2, #3 Transcripts 3, #4 Transcripts 1, #5 Transcripts 1) (Rodriguez, Magaly) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Rodriguez, Magaly) |
| Filing 8 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 10/8/2019 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS100195927. (vt) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Fee by Christopher Jackson (ls) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Magaly Rodriguez on behalf of Department of Corrections. Attorney Magaly Rodriguez added to party Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Rodriguez, Magaly) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254 on or before forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this Petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/10/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 10/10/2019. Motions due by 10/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/10/2019. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (fbn)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 9/10/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00 NOT PAID, filed by Christopher Jackson.(ebz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Miami-Dade/Monroe |
| Represented By: | Magaly Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
