Curatolo v. BCC Food Hall LLC
| Jean Curatolo |
| BCC Food Hall LLC |
| 1:2019cv23774 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Labor: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0704 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 9/14/2020 in Miami Division before Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Calendar Call set for 9/8/2020 11:00 AM before Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/7/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 10 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Jean Curatolo (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule Jointly Proposed By The Parties)(Sack, Paul) |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION REPORT by Ronald M. Friedman. Disposition: Case did not settle.(Salmon, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Ronald Freeman. (Sack, Paul) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Rosa Rodriguez. (Sack, Paul) |
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's REPLY to #5 Answer to Complaint by Jean Curatolo. (Sack, Paul) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by BCC Food Hall LLC. Attorney Joseph Stanley Shook added to party BCC Food Hall LLC(pty:dft). (Shook, Joseph) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters and Notice of Court Practices and Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 9/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BCC Food Hall LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BCC Food Hall LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11972139, filed by Jean Curatolo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons)(Sack, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Curatolo v. BCC Food Hall LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jean Curatolo | |
| Represented By: | Paul A. Sack |
| Represented By: | Richard Brandon Deegan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BCC Food Hall LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Stanley Shook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
