Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc. v. STS Logistic Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.
Defendant: Interport Logistics, LLC, STS Logistic Services, Inc. and Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv23921
Filed: September 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Becerra
Referring Judge: K Michael Moore
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0741
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Hold Scheduling Conference. #19 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #19 is GRANTED. The Parties shall hold a scheduling conference on or before December 19, 2019. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/18/2019. (mgh)
November 15, 2019 Filing 19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to hold a Scheduling Conference re 7 Pretrial Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,, by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.. Responses due by 11/29/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Liang, Shanshan)
November 13, 2019 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc. re #10 Amended Complaint, to STS Logistics Services, Inc. (Liang, Shanshan)
November 7, 2019 Filing 17 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.. Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC served on 10/29/2019, answer due 11/19/2019; STS Logistic Services, Inc. served on 10/31/2019, answer due 11/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC)(Liang, Shanshan)
November 5, 2019 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Interport Logistics, LLC identifying Other Affiliate B America Corporation for Interport Logistics, LLC (Spector, Andrew)
November 5, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS #10 Amended Complaint, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or in the Alternate, MOTION for More Definite Statement by Interport Logistics, LLC. Responses due by 11/19/2019 (Spector, Andrew)
October 25, 2019 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc. re #10 Amended Complaint, to Interport Logistics, LLC (Liang, Shanshan)
October 24, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Robert Spector on behalf of Interport Logistics, LLC. Attorney Andrew Robert Spector added to party Interport Logistics, LLC(pty:dft). (Spector, Andrew)
October 23, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alvaro Luis Mejer on behalf of Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.. Attorney Alvaro Luis Mejer added to party Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.(pty:pla). (Mejer, Alvaro)
October 23, 2019 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC, Interport Logistics, LLC, STS Logistic Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(ail)
October 22, 2019 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC, Interport Logistics, LLC, STS Logistic Services, Inc., filed by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Summon(s) Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC, #7 Summon(s) Interport Logistics, LLC, #8 Summon(s) STS Logistic Services, Inc.)(Liang, Shanshan)
October 17, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.. Interport Logistics, LLC served on 10/4/2019, answer due 10/25/2019. (Liang, Shanshan)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACQUELINE BECERRA. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra's discovery procedures. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/24/2019. (ah03)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuits Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court.Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/24/2019. (ah03)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Edward Recio, mailing date September 23, 2019, (cco)
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC, Interport Logistics, LLC, STS Logistic Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(ail)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc. re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet and Summons (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC, #2 Summon(s) Interport Logistics, LLC, #3 Summon(s) STS Logistic Services, Inc.) (Liang, Shanshan)
September 20, 2019 Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (amb)
September 20, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
September 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12001754, filed by Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Liang, Shanshan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc. v. STS Logistic Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Interport Logistics, LLC
Represented By: Andrew Robert Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STS Logistic Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elsbbagh Trading Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Econocaribe Consolidators, Inc.
Represented By: Shanshan Liang
Represented By: Alvaro Luis Mejer
Represented By: Edward Recio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?