The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
| The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc. |
| Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| 1:2019cv24179 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Dickenson, John) |
Filing 13
ORDER Granting Nunc Pro Tunc #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 12/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline Per DE#13 : Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company response due 12/2/2019. (cds) |
| Filing 12 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Second Amended Complaint re #10 Amended Complaint by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Responses due by 12/11/2019 (Pasternack, Chad) |
| Filing 11 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dickenson, John) |
| Filing 10 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, filed by The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Pye, Frederick) |
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT The Meadows Lake North Condominium against Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, filed by The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Pye, Frederick) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. per this Courts Order at Docket Entry #7. Docket Entry #7 shall govern Plaintiffs obligations in filing an amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. ( Amended Complaint due by 11/4/2019.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc. re #5 Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Pye, Frederick) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, ( Joint Planning and Scheduling Report due by 11/22/2019, Initial Planning and Scheduling Conference set for 12/6/2019 11:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Responses due by 10/25/2019 (Dickenson, John) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company response due 10/17/2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 10/10/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 (DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER DE#7) NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12054155, filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Composite Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Dickenson, John) Text Modified on 10/10/2019 (cds). No Answer/Motion To Dismiss Filed. Text Modified on 10/21/2019 (cds). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Meadows Lake North Condominium Association, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Frederick Joseph Pye, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | John David Dickenson |
| Represented By: | Chad A. Pasternack |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
