Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ines Garcia |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv24220 |
| October 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, for good cause shown in the application and Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service ordered: Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service at #1 Complaint filed by Ines Garcia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 10/25/2019. (EGT)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Judge Edwin G. Torres. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 10/18/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (ar2) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ines Garcia. (ar2) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr and Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Ines Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 IFP Application)(Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ines Garcia | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
