Viotes v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Eduardo Viotes |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv24223 |
| October 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jacqueline Becerra |
| James Lawrence King |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed United States Attorney's Office served on 10/28/2019, answer due 12/27/2019. (ebz) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security.(ebz) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 , #9 Summons Issued as to USA. Copy of certified Order, Summons and Complaint placed in U.S. Marshal's mailbox for service (ebz) Modified text on 10/21/2019 (ebz). |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ebz) |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Eduardo Viotes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 10/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS SCHEDULING ORDER. THIS CAUSE has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to the administrative procedures of the Court which govern the disposition of Social Security cases, ECF NO. 4 , and is before the Court sua sponte. Based upon a review of the record, it appears appropriate to enter a Scheduling Order to ensure the orderly and efficient disposition of this matter. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties shall comply with the following schedule: (1) Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment, setting forth the reasons for relief and including citations to the administrative record and relevant legal authorities, within thirty (30) days from the date that Defendant files an answer and the administrative record of the proceedings. (2) Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days after Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment. (3) Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's motion for summary judgment and file a reply in support of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days after Defendant files the response and motion as set forth above. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 10/21/2019. (jv00)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ebz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eduardo Viotes. (ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Eduardo Viotes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 IFP Application)(Palacios-Paredes, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Viotes v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eduardo Viotes | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
