Valdez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Tanya Valdez |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
1:2019cv24272 |
October 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Beth Bloom |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties by December 23, 2019. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with Courts Order Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificate of Interested Parties re 11 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, #8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with Courts Order Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificate of Interested Parties re #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Responses due by 12/27/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint or Other Case by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Response/Answer due by 12/24/2019. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Tanya Valdez. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 10 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Courts Order Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificate of Interested Parties by December 16, 2019. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB) |
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company by 12/19/2019. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Tanya Valdez. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with Courts Order Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificate of Interested Parties re #4 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Responses due by 12/16/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company by 12/9/2019. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Tanya Valdez. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Attorney Jeannine Cline Jacobson added to party Metropolitan Life Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Jeannine) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Tanya Valdez. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company served on 10/18/2019, answer due 11/8/2019. (Dabdoub, Edward) |
Filing 4 ORDER Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 10/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (bb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12069456, filed by Tanya Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Dabdoub, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Valdez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jeannine Cline Jacobson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tanya Valdez | |
Represented By: | Edward Philip Dabdoub |
Represented By: | Bryn Elizabeth Natland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.