Kareem v. Barr et al
Plaintiff: Ashraf Kareem
Defendant: Juan Acosta, James Martin, Kevin Mcaleenan and William Barr
Case Number: 1:2019cv24311
Filed: October 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jose E Martinez
Referring Judge: Lisette M Reid
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2019 Filing 16 PAPERLESS Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid/Case Closed by the District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/12/2019. (br)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Adopting #14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 28 USC 2241 case re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ashraf Kareem. Case be CLOSED. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (ail)
December 11, 2019 Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 28 USC 2241 case re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ashraf Kareem; Recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ECF No. #1 be DISMISSED AS MOOT and this case be CLOSED by the Clerk of Court. Objections to R&R due by 12/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
December 4, 2019 Filing 13 SECOND Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re 12 Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail,. US Mail returned for: Ashraf Kareem. The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two undeliverable notices from the Court, notices will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (mp)
November 14, 2019 Filing 12 FIRST Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re #4 Order of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant, #5 Order to Show Cause, 7 Order,,,. US Mail returned for: Ashraf Kareem. The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two undeliverable notices from the Court, notices will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. RTS/DEP (mp)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER re #10 Response/Reply (Other) filed Respondent. The Undersigned Orders that Petitioner may, if he so chooses, file a reply to the Response within one week. See S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(c). Petitioner's reply shall be due on or before November 11, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/4/2019. (ac01)
November 4, 2019 Filing 10 RESPONSE to 7 Order,,, by Juan Acosta, William Barr, James Martin, Kevin Mcaleenan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rodriguez, Marlene)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Supplement shall be due on or before November 8, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/4/2019. (ac01)
November 1, 2019 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond to Order re 7 Order,,, by Juan Acosta, William Barr, James Martin, Kevin Mcaleenan. Responses due by 11/15/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rodriguez, Marlene)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER re #6 Response to Order to Show Cause. The Response states that Petitioner has been removed from the United States and cites as proof Exhibit A. [ECF 6-1]. However, a review of Exhibit A shows a warrant date of August 9, 2019, and the space where the "[p]ort, date, and manner of removal" appears is illegible and the Undersigned is unable to determine what it says. [See ECF 6-1 p. 3]. Thus, while Petitioner no longer appears on ICE's Online Detainee Locator System, Exhibit A does not demonstrate on its own that Petitioner is no longer in ICE custody. Accordingly, the Undersigned hereby ORDERS Respondent to file a Supplemental Response demonstrating that Petitioner has been removed. The Supplemental Response shall be due on or before November 1, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/25/2019. (ac01)
October 25, 2019 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, by James Martin, Juan Acosta, Kevin Mcaleenan, William Barr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rodriguez, Marlene)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 28 U.S.C. 2241. On or before three (3) days from the date of this order, Respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this Petition should not be granted and shall file all documents and transcripts necessary for the resolution of the Petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
October 21, 2019 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 10/21/2019 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number FLS100196590. (vt)
October 17, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ebz)
October 17, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. No-IFP-Filing fee $ 5.00 NOT PAID/No IFP, filed by Ashraf Kareem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letters)(ebz) Modified text on 10/18/2019 (ebz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kareem v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juan Acosta
Represented By: Noticing 2241/Bivens US Attorney
Represented By: Marlene Rodriguez
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Martin
Represented By: Noticing 2241/Bivens US Attorney
Represented By: Marlene Rodriguez
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Mcaleenan
Represented By: Noticing 2241/Bivens US Attorney
Represented By: Marlene Rodriguez
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Barr
Represented By: Noticing 2241/Bivens US Attorney
Represented By: Marlene Rodriguez
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashraf Kareem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?