JONES v. SAUL
| AUBREY DALE JONES |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 1:2019cv24324 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (lbc) |
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based on the record presented in the application, which satisfies the requirements of the EJA. USM Service ordered: Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service Re: #1 Complaint and #7 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 12/11/2019. (EGT)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AUBREY DALE JONES. (Attachments: #1 US Marshal form USM-285 (United States Attorney), #2 USM-285 form - Office of the General Counsel, #3 USM-285 form - Attorney General of the US)(Bohr, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 5 Notice of Court Practice. Document Filed in Wrong Case; Document restricted and docket text modified. Document refiled in correct case # _17-cv-60452-UU_. (kpe) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The filing fee has not been paid (drz) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Filing fees not paid. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Compliance of Filing Fee, and electronically pay the correct fees of $400.00 within 24 hours of this notice. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by AUBREY DALE JONES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) United States Attorney, #3 Summon(s) Office of General Counsel, #4 Summon(s) Attorney General of the United States)(Bohr, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JONES v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AUBREY DALE JONES | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Harriet Bohr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
