TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. CellnTell Distribution Inc. et al
TracFone Wireless, Inc. |
Simtec Trading LLC, SGM Socher, Inc., Simcha Charlop, SD Communications, Inc., Yosef Greenwald, Levi Edelkopf, Sajid Butt, Muhammad Shoaib, CellnTell Distribution Inc., SK Mobile LTD, Muhammad Awais, Umar Warraich, Faizan Vali, Farhad Ashraf Khan, CNT Wireless LLC and Manish Gupta |
1:2019cv24325 |
October 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CellnTell Distribution Inc., Muhammad Shoaib. (kpe) |
Filing 5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Expedite Discovery on a limited basis, Plaintiff's MOTION Order directing service on Canadian defendants by mail by TracFone Wireless, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Kevin Wehling, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Weiss, Aaron) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) and Civil Cover Sheet by TracFone Wireless, Inc. re #1 Complaint,,,,,, filed by TracFone Wireless, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Summonses) (Weiss, Aaron) |
Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint) (jao) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12078584, filed by TracFone Wireless, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copies of the certificates of registration issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, #2 Exhibit B - The Terms and Conditions for the various TracFone brands, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit from Ali re CNT, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit from Ali re SK Mobile, #5 Exhibit E - Affidavit from Ali re SGM Socher, #6 Exhibit F - Affidavit from Ali re SD Communications, #7 Exhibit G - WhatsApp communication with CNT Wireless, #8 Exhibit H - Invoice for undercover CNT Wireless purchase October 2017, #9 Exhibit I - Wire transfer receipt October 2017, #10 Exhibit J - Shipping label October 2017, #11 Exhibit K - Photo of purchased TracFone Phones October 2017, #12 Exhibit L - Invoice from undercover purchase November 2017, #13 Exhibit M - Shipping label November 2017, #14 Exhibit N - Invoice for undercover CNT Wireless purchase July 2018, #15 Exhibit O - Wire transfer receipt July 2018, #16 Exhibit P - Shipping label July 2018, #17 Exhibit Q - WhatsApp communication with Simtec Trading, #18 Exhibit R - Invoice from undercover purchase with Simtec Trading May 2018, #19 Exhibit S - Final Judgments and Permanent Injunctions obtained by other companies, #20 Exhibit T - Criminal Contempt Orders, #21 Exhibit U - Final Judgment obtained by AT&T against CNT Wireless, #22 Exhibit V - Copies of court documents, press releases, and news reports regarding these incidents)(Weiss, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.