Garcia v. Stulz et al
Plaintiff: William Sanchez Garcia
Defendant: Director Enid Stulz and Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan
Case Number: 1:2019cv24496
Filed: October 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Federico A Moreno
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Edward Cheek on behalf of Kevin McAleenan, Enid Stulz. Attorney Christopher Edward Cheek added to party Kevin McAleenan(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Edward Cheek added to party Enid Stulz(pty:dft). (Cheek, Christopher)
October 31, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney's Office, William Barr, Enid Stulz, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (amb)
October 30, 2019 Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Noticing INS Attorney on behalf of Kevin McAleenan, Enid Stulz.. Attorney Noticing INS Attorney added to party Kevin McAleenan(pty:dft), Attorney Noticing INS Attorney added to party Enid Stulz(pty:dft). (asl)
October 30, 2019 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (amb)
October 30, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
October 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for APA Judicial Review and Declaratory Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12109207, filed by William Sanchez Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A - I-485 Denial Decision)(Soto, Eduardo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Stulz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director Enid Stulz
Represented By: Christopher Edward Cheek
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan
Represented By: Christopher Edward Cheek
Represented By: Noticing INS Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Sanchez Garcia
Represented By: Eduardo Rigoberto Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?