Falke v. General Star Indemnity Company
Michael Falke |
General Star Indemnity Company |
1:2019cv24592 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Robert N Scola |
Edwin G Torres |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Star Indemnity Company identifying Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Corporate Parent General Re Corporation, Corporate Parent General Reinsurance Corporation for General Star Indemnity Company (Kuczynski, Dana) |
![]() |
Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by General Star Indemnity Company. (Kuczynski, Dana) |
Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by General Star Indemnity Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Proposed Schedule)(Kuczynski, Dana) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by General Star Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kuczynski, Dana) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment,. Incorrect Magistrate Judge Selected; Corrected by the Clerk. (jao) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) Modified on 11/7/2019 (jao). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Damages) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12125637, filed by General Star Indemnity Company. No Answer and/or Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit "B" - Property Appraiser Website, #3 Exhibit "C" - FLOIR Website, #4 Exhibit "D" - Estimate, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kuczynski, Dana) Modified on 11/6/2019 (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Falke v. General Star Indemnity Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Falke | |
Represented By: | Jack Benmeleh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: General Star Indemnity Company | |
Represented By: | Ira S. Bergman |
Represented By: | Dana Beth Kuczynski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.