Steiner v. Rageon, Inc
Samantha Steiner |
Rageon, Inc |
1:2019cv24600 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ursula Ungaro |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 12/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (ar2) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Samantha Steiner (Shamis, Andrew) |
Filing 8 Clerks Entry of Default as to Rageon, Inc per Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default Re: #7 Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 12/6/2019. (pcs) |
Filing 7 Order Directing Clerk to Enter Default(s) as to Rageon, Inc (Motion for Final Default Judgment due 12/16/2019). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 12/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (pcs) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Samantha Steiner. Rageon, Inc served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Shamis, Andrew) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiff has failed to serve Defendant and provide Proof of Service. Show Cause Response due by 12/2/2019. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 11/25/2019. See attached document for full details. (lk) |
Filing 4 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: ( Joint Scheduling Report due by 12/6/2019, Scheduling Conference set for 12/20/2019 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Ursula Ungaro.) Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 11/13/2019. See attached document for full details. (lk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Rageon, Inc. (jas) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rageon, Inc. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12126424, filed by Samantha Steiner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Shamis, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Steiner v. Rageon, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rageon, Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Samantha Steiner | |
Represented By: | Andrew John Shamis |
Represented By: | Garrett O. Berg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.