Arzuaga v. Saul
Plaintiff: Dermi Arzuaga
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv24633
Filed: November 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Referring Judge: Lauren Fleischer Louis
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, within seven (7) days of perfecting service upon Defendant, Plaintiff shall file proof of such service with the Court. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 12/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
November 12, 2019 Filing 6 Clerk's NOTICE of Compliance re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Summons Issued as to USA Copy of certified Order, Summons and Complaint placed in U.S. Marshal's mailbox for service. (ebz)
November 12, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(ebz)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Dermi Arzuaga. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/8/2019. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
November 8, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dermi Arzuaga. (ebz) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/8/2019) (ebz).
November 8, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom and Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
November 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Dermi Arzuaga. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Affidavit)(Goetz, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arzuaga v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dermi Arzuaga
Represented By: David B. Goetz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?