Niebla v. JPAY, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jorge L. Niebla
Defendant: JPAY, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv24641
Filed: November 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Federico A Moreno
Referring Judge: Lisette M Reid
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2019 Filing 8 PAPERLESS Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid/Case Closed by the District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/31/2019. (br)
December 30, 2019 Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of JPAY, Inc. against Jorge L. Niebla. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (mmc)
December 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Adopting #5 Report and Recommendations and Dismissing Complaint. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jorge L. Niebla, #4 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jorge L. Niebla Recommending Plaintiff is a three-striker and has, #4 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jorge L. Niebla. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 12/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (mmc)
December 9, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jorge L. Niebla, #4 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jorge L. Niebla; Recommending the Court of his intent to dismiss his case ECF No. #4 , the Undersigned RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss ECF No. #4 , be GRANTED, that Plaintiff's Complaint ECF No. #1 , be DISMISSED and the case CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/9/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
November 26, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens by Jorge L. Niebla. Responses due by 12/10/2019 (amb)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 11/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
November 8, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ebz)
November 8, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against JPAY, Inc.. Filing fee $ 400.00, Not Paid/Due/No IFP Filed, filed by Jorge L. Niebla.(ebz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Niebla v. JPAY, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge L. Niebla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPAY, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?