Stone v. Isicoff
| Barbara Stone |
| Laurel M. Isicoff |
| 1:2019cv24674 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL Closing Case. Motions terminated: 3 SEALED MOTION to Seal Application to File in Pauperis by Barbara Stone. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/14/2019. See document #7 for image/full details. (nc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Denying 4 Motion to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's emergency writ of prohibition and demand jury trial (DE 1) is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/14/2019. See attached document for full details. (nc)
|
| Filing 6 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Filing fees not paid or Motion IFP Filed. (jc) Modified on 11/13/2019 - Clerk's Notice to Filer: Filed in Error, documents has been filed under sealed (jc). |
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Civil Cover Sheet. (jc) Modified on 11/13/2019 - Clerk's Notice to Filer: Filed in Error, see DE #1 additional attachment added for image (jc). |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jas) |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY Petition (COMPLAINT) for Writ of Prohibition and Demand for Jury Trial to Prohibit Laural M. Isicoff, an Illegally Acting Non Article III Who is Disqualified from Acting and to Mandate the Disqualification of the Disqualified Judge. Filing fees $ 400.00 (MOTION IFP FILED), Bankruptcy Court case number 19-16164-LMI, filed by Barbara Stone. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-G)(jas) Modified text on 11/12/2019 (jc). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/13/2019: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jas). |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 4 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (mc) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 3 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (mc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stone v. Isicoff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara Stone | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Laurel M. Isicoff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
