Life Insurance Company of the Southwest v. Haedo
| Life Insurance Company of the Southwest |
| Meylen Haedo |
| 1:2019cv24739 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Paul C Huck |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Life Insurance Company of the Southwest against Meylen Haedo, Granting : #7 Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment and Memorandum of Law In Support filed by Life Insurance Company of the Southwest. Signed by Senior Judge Paul C. Huck on 1/8/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment and Memorandum of Law In Support by Life Insurance Company of the Southwest. (Preston, Brett) |
| Filing 6 Clerks Entry of Default as to Meylen Haedo - Motions Terminated: #5 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 1/6/2020. (cds) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default by Life Insurance Company of the Southwest. (Preston, Brett) Converted Motion to correct default on 1/6/2020 (mf). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Life Insurance Company of the Southwest. Meylen Haedo served on 11/26/2019, answer due 12/17/2019. (Preston, Brett) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Meylen Haedo. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Paul C. Huck. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Meylen Haedo. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12151106, filed by Life Insurance Company of the Southwest. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D)(Preston, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Life Insurance Company of the Southwest v. Haedo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Meylen Haedo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Life Insurance Company of the Southwest | |
| Represented By: | Carolina Blanco |
| Represented By: | Brett Joseph Preston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
