Copeland v. Atlas Flowers, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jason Copeland
Defendant: Atlas Flowers, Inc. and Atlas Flowers, Inc. a Florida corporation doing business as Golden Flowers
Case Number: 1:2019cv24839
Filed: November 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Donald L Graham
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #7 Statement by Atlas Flowers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gonya, Patrick)
January 8, 2020 Filing 7 Statement of: Claim by Jason Copeland re #4 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other (Tuschman, Richard)
January 6, 2020 Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE as to #1 Complaint filed by Atlas Flowers, Inc.. (Gonya, Patrick)
January 6, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick Edward Gonya, Jr on behalf of Atlas Flowers, Inc.. Attorney Patrick Edward Gonya, Jr added to party Atlas Flowers, Inc.(pty:dft). (Gonya, Patrick)
December 30, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Court Practice in FLSA cases. Signed by Senior Judge Donald L. Graham on 12/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (mno)
November 22, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Atlas Flowers, Inc. (mee)
November 22, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Donald L. Graham. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
November 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Atlas Flowers, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12172248, filed by Jason Copeland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Tuschman, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Copeland v. Atlas Flowers, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atlas Flowers, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick Edward Gonya, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atlas Flowers, Inc. a Florida corporation doing business as Golden Flowers
Represented By: Patrick Edward Gonya, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Copeland
Represented By: Richard David Tuschman
Represented By: Mark J. Beutler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?