Integrated Security Systems, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Integrated Security Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Lexington Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv24892
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Marcia G Cooke
Referring Judge: Jonathan Goodman
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2019 Filing 6 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule by Integrated Security Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Exhibit Election to Jurisdiction)(Gassenheimer, James)
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF REFERRAL AND ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 12/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (smz)
December 2, 2019 Filing 4 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Lexington Insurance Company. (Smith, Stephen)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Compliance With 18 U.S.C. Section 1446(d) by Lexington Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, filed by Lexington Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Filed Notice of Removal from State Court) (Smith, Stephen)
November 26, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe)
November 26, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint for Breach of Contract) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12180513, filed by Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Lexington OIR Information, #3 Exhibit State Court Docket and Record, #4 Exhibit December 2018 Demand Email, #5 Exhibit Michel O. Weisz, P.A. Legal Bills, #6 Exhibit Berger Singerman Legal Bills, #7 Exhibit September 5, 2019 Demand Letter, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Integrated Security Systems, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Integrated Security Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Arun Gopal Ravindran
Represented By: James Daryl Gassenheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lexington Insurance Company
Represented By: Joel D. Adler
Represented By: Stephen Paul Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?