Camacho v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff: Allison Lizette Camacho
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Case Number: 1:2019cv24921
Filed: November 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: James Lawrence King
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2020 Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Russomanno, Suzette)
January 22, 2020 Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. identifying Corporate Parent Wal-Mart, Inc., Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Other Affiliate WSE Management, LLC, Other Affiliate WSE Investment, LLC, Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC for Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Russomanno, Suzette)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Denying #3 Motion to Strike. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 1/3/2020. See attached document for full details. (jw)
December 18, 2019 Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike Defendant's Third Affirmative Defense filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.. Replies due by 12/26/2019. (Russomanno, Suzette)
December 5, 2019 Filing 3 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike Defendant's Third Affirmative Defense by Allison Lizette Camacho. Responses due by 12/19/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Medina, Monica)
November 27, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb)
November 27, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12185186, filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Russomanno, Suzette)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Camacho v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Represented By: William Edwards
Represented By: Suzette Luisa Russomanno
Represented By: Jerry Dean Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allison Lizette Camacho
Represented By: Monica Medina
Represented By: Jose Manuel Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?