Bradford v. Inch
| Christopher J. Bradford |
| Mark Inch |
| 1:2019cv24965 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| James Lawrence King |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Partial Filing Fee received on 1/30/2020 in the amount of $ 350.00, receipt number FLS100202562. (vt) |
| Filing 9 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Partial Filing Fee received on 1/2/2020 in the amount of $ 50.00, receipt number FLS100200977. (vt) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $350.00. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher J. Bradford. (pes) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff filed his motion to proceed in forma pauperis but failed to submit the supporting statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months for any institutional account in his name. Accordingly, on or before January 3, 2020, Plaintiff shall file the required supporting, certified inmate account statement, or pay the Clerks filing fee of $400.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/4/2019. (ac01)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of Fact and Law Re: #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 by Christopher J. Bradford. (ar2) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher J. Bradford. (ar2) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ar2) |
| Filing 1 Denial of Access Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Mark Inch. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Christopher J. Bradford.(ar2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradford v. Inch | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mark Inch | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher J. Bradford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
