Torres v. United States of America
Jorge Luis Torres |
United States of America |
1:2019cv25150 |
December 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Paul C Huck |
Lisette M Reid |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as per DE 7 : Miscellaneous(Motion to vacate) Deadline 3/16/2020. (lk) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Movant shall file his motion to vacate by March 16, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 2/3/2020. (ac01) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Motion to Vacate re #3 Order,,, Add Attorneys,, by Jorge Luis Torres. Responses due by 2/13/2020 (Entin, Alvin) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jason A. Reding on behalf of United States of America (Reding, Jason) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jason A. Reding on behalf of United States of America. Attorney Jason A. Reding added to party United States of America(pty:dft). (Reding, Jason) |
Filing 3 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE., Attorney Alvin Ernest Entin for Jorge Luis Torres added for Motion Attacking Sentence/Motion to Vacate Sentence (28 USC 2255) CJA representation. On or before forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this Order, Attorney Alvin Entin shall file a motion to vacate with supporting memorandum of law, in compliance with the local and federal rules governing such filings, addressing with specificity whether the motion should be granted in light of the Supreme Courts decision in Davis. Date attorney was appointed CJA: 12/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 12/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge Paul C. Huck and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (jc) |
Filing 1 SUCCESSIVE MOTION (Complaint) to Vacate Sentence (2255). NOTE: All further docketing is to be done in the civil case. (Criminal Case # 1:08-cr-20231-PCH-6), filed by Jorge Luis Torres. (Attachments: #1 Petitioner Application for Leave to File a Second Motion to Vacate 2255, #2 Petitioner Request for Second or Successive 2255, #3 USCA Cover Letter Rec'd)(jc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Torres v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jorge Luis Torres | |
Represented By: | Alvin Ernest Entin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Noticing 2255 US Attorney |
Represented By: | Jason A. Reding |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.