Gomez v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
Rafael Gomez |
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
1:2019cv25222 |
December 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ursula Ungaro |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Rafael Gomez (Martinez-Cid, Ricardo) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Answer due 3/6/2020. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 2/11/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 11 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Beth Bloom recused. Case reassigned to Judge Ursula Ungaro for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (yar) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Pfizer, Inc.. Attorney Veronica Louise De Zayas added to party Pfizer, Inc.(pty:dft). (De Zayas, Veronica) |
Filing 9 ORDER On Default Procedures, (Pfizer, Inc. response due 2/13/2020.) ( Motions due by 2/20/2020.) Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/6/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Rafael Gomez. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. waiver sent on 1/7/2020, answer due 3/9/2020. (Martinez-Cid, Ricardo) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Rafael Gomez. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC waiver sent on 1/7/2020, answer due 3/9/2020. (Martinez-Cid, Ricardo) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Rafael Gomez. Pfizer, Inc. served on 1/15/2020, answer due 2/5/2020. (Martinez-Cid, Ricardo) |
Filing 5 ORDER to File Proof of Service. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/21/2020. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 12/20/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. (kpe) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12244384, filed by Rafael Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons, #3 Summon(s) Summons, #4 Summon(s) Summons, #5 Summon(s) Summons, #6 Summon(s) Summons, #7 Summon(s) Summons)(Martinez-Cid, Ricardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.