ALCENA et al v. P-1 SECURITY CORP. et al
| LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, KENOLD ALCENA, JEAN SUCCES and DIEUBON DESIMA |
| P1 SECURITY SERV, INC, Pedro Gonzalez and P-1 SECURITY CORP. |
| 1:2020cv20048 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Compliance Certificate of Service by KENOLD ALCENA, DIEUBON DESIMA, LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, JEAN SUCCES re #10 Order,, Set Answer Due Deadline, (Eiss, Charles) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. per DE #10 (mr1) |
Filing 10
ORDER ON DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT PROCEDURE, Pedro Gonzalez response due 3/7/2020; P-1 SECURITY CORP. response due 3/7/2020; P1 SECURITY SERV, INC response due 3/7/2020 (Motion for Default Final Judgment due 3/13/2020). Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 2/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
| Filing 9 Clerks Entry of Default as to P-1 SECURITY CORP., P1 SECURITY SERV, INC, PEDRO GONZALEZ Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 2/7/2020. (lbc) |
| Filing 8 Clerks Entry of Default as to P-1 SECURITY CORP., P1 SECURITY SERV, INC, PEDRO GONZALEZ. Motions Terminated: #7 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 2/7/2020. (lbc) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to All Defendants by JEAN SUCCES, KENOLD ALCENA, LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, DIEUBON DESIMA. (Eiss, Charles) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JEAN SUCCES, KENOLD ALCENA, LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, DIEUBON DESIMA. P1 SECURITY SERV, INC served on 1/15/2020, answer due 2/5/2020. (Eiss, Charles) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JEAN SUCCES, KENOLD ALCENA, LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, DIEUBON DESIMA. P-1 SECURITY CORP. served on 1/15/2020, answer due 2/5/2020. (Eiss, Charles) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JEAN SUCCES, KENOLD ALCENA, LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, DIEUBON DESIMA. Pedro Gonzalez served on 1/15/2020, answer due 2/5/2020. (Eiss, Charles) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pedro Gonzalez, P-1 SECURITY CORP., P1 SECURITY SERV, INC. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12279284, filed by JEAN SUCCES, KENOLD ALCENA, LOUVERDIEU LINDOR, DIEUBON DESIMA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s))(Eiss, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
