Miller v. Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD
Virginia Miller |
Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD |
1:2020cv20076 |
January 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Edwin G Torres |
Kathleen M Williams |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #12 Motion to Reopen Case. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Parties' motion to reopen this matter #12 . Upon review of the motion, record, and applicable law, the Parties' motion #12 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 3/5/2020. (sgi) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Reopen Case by Virginia Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Winkleman, Michael) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER DISMISSING AND CLOSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on a sua sponte review of the record. On January 13, 2020, this Court entered an Order #4 stating that "WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date that the last defendant responds to the complaint, the Parties shall file a joint conference report and a joint proposed scheduling order, as required by S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1(b)." The Order also states "Non-compliance with any provision of this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, or this Court's Practices and Procedures may subject the offending party to sanctions, including dismissal of this case. It is the duty of all counsel to take all actions necessary to comply with this Order." See Watts v. Club Madonna, Inc., et al., No. 18-13764 (11th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019). To date, the Parties have not filed a joint conference report or a joint proposed scheduling order and have not filed a motion for an extension of time to do so. Accordingly, upon a review of the record, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 2/26/2020. (sgi) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc E Weiner on behalf of Virginia Miller. Attorney Marc E Weiner added to party Virginia Miller(pty:pla). (Weiner, Marc) |
Filing 9 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD identifying Other Affiliate Paul Hehir for Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD (Alcivar, Natasha) |
Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD. Attorney Natasha K. Alcivar added to party Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD(pty:dft). (Alcivar, Natasha) |
Filing 7 Clerks Notice to Filer re #5 Summons Returned Executed. Incorrect Party Selected as Served; ERROR - The filer selected the incorrect party for service. The correction was made by the Clerk and filing was re-docketed, see [de#6]. It is not necessary to refile this document. (ls) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Virginia Miller. Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD served on 1/10/2020, answer due 1/31/2020. (ls)(See Image at DE #5) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Virginia Miller. Virginia Miller served on 1/10/2020, answer due 1/31/2020. (Winkleman, Michael) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters, and Notice of Court Practices and Procedures. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 1/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD. (pes) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pes) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12287944, filed by Virginia Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Winkleman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Virginia Miller | |
Represented By: | Michael A. Winkleman |
Represented By: | Marc E Weiner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD | |
Represented By: | Natasha K. Alcivar |
Represented By: | Paul Joseph Hehir |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.