Jackson v. Inch et al
Plaintiff: Jessie Jackson
Defendant: J.R. Delgado, Mark S. Inch and F. Papillion
Case Number: 1:2020cv20294
Filed: January 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Referring Judge: Lisette M Reid
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2020 Filing 16 Summons (Affidavit) Returned Unexecuted as to J.R. Delgado. (drz)
March 17, 2020 Filing 15 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 14 Summons Returned Executed. Document Restricted Due to Error; Summons was unexecuted. Wrong Event used by clerk. (drz)
March 17, 2020 Filing 13 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 F. Papillion served on 3/16/2020, answer due 4/6/2020. (drz)
March 17, 2020 Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline per clerks error: (drz)
March 10, 2020 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to J.R. Delgado. (fbn)
March 10, 2020 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to F. Papillion. (fbn)
March 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE SERVICE OF PROCESS REQUIRING PERSONAL SERVICE UPON AN INDIVIDUAL(S): Dr. F. Papillon and Dr. J. Delgado. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 3/10/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; Adopting #6 Report and Recommendations. Certificate of Appealability: No Ruling Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/2/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz)
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER striking #7 Motion to Produce. The Plaintiff's request for production is stricken. The complaint has been screened however the report has not yet been adopted. After the defendants are served a scheduling order will be issued setting a discovery period. Plaintiff is advised that requests for production must be served on the Defendant or person to whom they are directed. Such request should be made after the defendants have been served and filed an answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 3/2/2020. (jb01)
February 28, 2020 Filing 7 STRICKEN First for Production of Documents Pursuant to Rule 26(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. by Jessie Jackson. (drz) Modified on 3/3/2020 stricken per de#8(dj).
February 14, 2020 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens filed by Jessie Jackson; Recommending that: 1.The claims against Dr. Delgado and Dr. Papillon for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need should proceed; 2.The claim against Mark Inch, should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 1915(e). Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 2/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee but Establishing Debt to Clerk of $350.00. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 1/24/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 1/24/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
January 22, 2020 Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Motions referred to Lisette M. Reid. (ebz)
January 22, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessie Jackson. (ebz)
January 22, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against J.R. Delgado, Mark S. Inch, F. Papillion. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed/NOT PAID/DUE, filed by Jessie Jackson.(ebz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Inch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.R. Delgado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark S. Inch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: F. Papillion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?