Blum v. On Call International, LLC et al
| Mark Blum |
| On Call International, LLC and Helidosa Aviation Group SA |
| 1:2020cv20497 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12391118, filed by On Call International, LLC. (No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Demand Letter, #2 Exhibit B. Eubanks Email Correspondence Dated January 14, 2020, #3 Exhibit C. Notice of Waiver of Service, #4 Exhibit D. Complaint, #5 Exhibit E. State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Exhibit F. Signed Waiver of Service, #7 Exhibit G. State Court Docket, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hechtman, Brandon) Modified on 2/3/2020 (mc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
