Guzman v. Receivable Management Group, Inc.
Andy Guzman |
Receivable Management Group, Inc. |
1:2020cv20709 |
February 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Marcia G Cooke |
Jonathan Goodman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES. (For Image see DE#8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 4/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) Text Modified on 4/7/2020 (cds). |
Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint filed by Receivable Management Group, Inc.. (Ehrlich, Steven) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint filed by Andy Guzman. Replies due by 4/6/2020. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 5 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint by Receivable Management Group, Inc.. Attorney Steven Lane Ehrlich added to party Receivable Management Group, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 3/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Ehrlich, Steven) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Andy Guzman. Receivable Management Group, Inc. served on 2/24/2020, answer due 3/16/2020. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Receivable Management Group, Inc.. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Receivable Management Group, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12476355, filed by Andy Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Guzman v. Receivable Management Group, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Receivable Management Group, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Steven Lane Ehrlich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andy Guzman | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.