Rocha v. Social Security
| Maria Rocha |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2020cv20764 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| John J O'Sullivan |
| Ursula Ungaro |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed Ariana Fajardo Orshan, USAO served on 3/10/2020, answer due 5/10/2020. (drz) Modified on 3/11/2020 (drz). |
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Commissioner of Social Security response due 5/10/2020. (Clerk Initially Enter wrong service date) (drz) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. (dj) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Maria Rocha. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 2/25/2020. See attached document for full details. (tro)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (drz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maria Rocha. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ursula Ungaro and Ch. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Maria Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Extension Request Pending at Appeals Council, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summon(s) USAG, #4 Summon(s) Commissioner, SSA, #5 Summon(s) USA SD FL, #6 Affidavit IFP Affidavit/Motion, #7 Supplement USM Form USAG, #8 Supplement USM Form Commissioner, #9 Supplement USM Form USA SD FL)(Freeman, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rocha v. Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maria Rocha | |
| Represented By: | Heather Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
