UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Vina Guerra et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Dayan Vina Guerra, Julaisy Dominguez and Dayan Vina |
| 1:2020cv20848 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint. Answer due on or before 5/26/2020. No further extensions will be granted absent compelling circumstances. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/22/2020. (jd00)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by Julaisy Dominguez, Dayan Vina Guerra. (Seitles, Marc) |
| Reset Deadlines Julaisy Dominguez answer due 4/26/2020; Dayan Vina Guerra answer due 4/26/2020 Per DE#9. (cqs) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint. Defendants shall file a response on or before April 26, 2020. All other deadlines remain unaffected. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 3/20/2020. (kml)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Julaisy Dominguez, Dayan Vina Guerra. (Seitles, Marc) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc David Seitles on behalf of Julaisy Dominguez. Attorney Marc David Seitles added to party Julaisy Dominguez(pty:dft). (Seitles, Marc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc David Seitles on behalf of Dayan Vina Guerra. Attorney Marc David Seitles added to party Dayan Vina Guerra(pty:dft). (Seitles, Marc) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Dayan Vina Guerra served on 3/4/2020, answer due 3/25/2020. (Geiger, Brett) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Julaisy Dominguez served on 3/4/2020, answer due 3/25/2020. (Geiger, Brett) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Julaisy Dominguez, Dayan Vina Guerra. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Avoid Fraudulent Transfer and Foreclose against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. USA Filer - No Filing Fee Required, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Dayan Vina Guerra, #3 Summon(s) Julaisy Dominguez, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Civil Complaint Cover Sheet)(Geiger, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
