Patterson v. United States of America
| Dimitri Patterson |
| United States of America |
| 1:2020cv21028 |
| March 6, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Clerk's NOTICE of Compliance re #7 Order Dismissing Case, copy of order mailed to Dimitri Patterson via CM/ECF. (pcs) |
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Closing Case. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 4/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
Filing 6
Order Denying Preliminary Injunction, denying #1 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Dimitri Patterson. (Complaint due by 4/8/2020.) Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 3/25/2020. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
Filing 5
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to the Magistrate Judge, referring case to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 3/9/2020. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's emergency motion for preliminary injunction #1 and determined that an emergency circumstance is not present. This case will be handled in the ordinary course. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (dka)
|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Filing Deficiency Re: #1 Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Document(s) missing required signature(s) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a)). (ar2) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2) |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Preliminary Statement against United States of America. Filing fees $ 400.00 (Not Paid/No IFP), filed by Dimitri Patterson.(ar2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patterson v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dimitri Patterson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.