Gazahan et al v. Groisman et al
| Hana Gazahan, Daniel Gazahan, Amen-Ziona Gazahan, Mercy Gazahan, Binyamin Gazahan and Emanuella Gazahan |
| Wizo Usa Inc., Judit A. Groisman, Renee Techelet, Noam Solberg, Amy Blavin, George Kara, Lynn Schusterman, Yfat Moyal, Isaac Amit, Paul Blavin, Uzi Fogelman and Esther Hayut |
| 1:2020cv21058 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants Esther Hayut, Noam Sohlberg, Uzi Vogelman, Isaac Amit, and George Karra's letter to the Court requesting that the Court consider dismissing, sua sponte, the claims against them pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). #7 . Local Rule 7.7 states that "[u]nless invited or directed by the presiding Judge, attorneys and any party represented by an attorney shall not... address or present to the Court in the form of a letter or the like any application requesting relief in any form, citing authorities, or presenting arguments." A request for dismissal should not be made via letter to the Court but may instead be filed as a motion in compliance with the Local Rules. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUGED that the letter #7 is hereby STRICKEN. The Clerk of Court is directed to STRIKE the letter #7 . Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 4/14/2020. (tsr)
|
| Filing 7 Statement of: Israeli Official Defendants by Isaac Amit, Uzi Fogelman, Esther Hayut, George Kara, Yfat Moyal, Noam Solberg, Renee Techelet (Michael, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Isaac Amit, Amy Blavin, Paul Blavin, Uzi Fogelman, Judit A. Groisman, Esther Hayut, George Kara, Yfat Moyal, Lynn Schusterman, Noam Solberg, Renee Techelet, Wizo Usa Inc.. (lbc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/12/2020. See attached document for full details. (tsr)
|
| Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Binyamin Gazahan to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: Mercy7mercy2000@gmail.com (drz) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amen-Ziona Gazahan, Binyamin Gazahan, Daniel Gazahan, Emanuella Gazahan, Hana Gazahan, Mercy Gazahan. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Isaac Amit, Amy Blavin, Paul Blavin, Uzi Fogelman, Judit A. Groisman, Esther Hayut, George Kara, Yfat Moyal, Lynn Schusterman, Noam Solberg, Renee Techelet, Wizo Usa Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Mercy Gazahan, Binyamin Gazahan, Hana Gazahan, Emanuella Gazahan, Amen-Ziona Gazahan, Daniel Gazahan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
