Chabad Chayil, Inc. v. The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida
| Chabad Chayil, Inc. |
| The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida |
| 1:2020cv21084 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Chabad Chayil, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stok, Robert)
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida. Replies due by 5/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10 - Part 1, #11 Exhibit 10 - Part 2)(Smith, Schuyler)
|
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER: The Court grants in part #10 the Defendant's opposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. The Defendant's request for an indefinite stay, however, is denied. Because of difficulties presented by the current crisis, and considering Judge Torres's granting of an extension of time for the Defendant to respond to the Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court affords the Defendants until May 22, 2020, to respond to the complaint. The Court is not unmindful of the unprecedented difficulties presented by the Coronavirus pandemic. At the same time, there is much the parties and attorneys can accomplish remotely, and while maintaining social distancing, in litigating this case. To the extent that these tasks can be accomplished, the Court will endeavor to encourage parties to continue litigating their cases whenever that may be possible. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (kbe)
|
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction #4 ; denying #9 Motion to Stay. Defendant's request for a reasonable extension of time, given the current circumstances, is Granted in part for good cause shown. Response now due 4/25/2020. If additional time is required after efforts are made to timely respond, another extension can be requested. A request for an indefinite stay of the response period is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 3/26/2020. (EGT)
|
|
Filing 11
Notice of Supplemental Authority re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, or Alternatively MOTION to Stay , #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction or Alternatively MOTION to Stay by The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida (Smith, Schuyler)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, or Alternatively, MOTION to Stay ( Responses due by 4/7/2020) by The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Stay, #6 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time)(Smith, Schuyler)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction or Alternatively, MOTION to Stay ( Responses due by 4/7/2020) by The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Stay, #6 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time)(Smith, Schuyler)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Schuyler Analise Smith on behalf of The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida. Attorney Schuyler Analise Smith added to party The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida(pty:dft). (Smith, Schuyler)
|
|
Filing 7
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE as to #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued filed by Chabad Chayil, Inc.. (Stok, Robert)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Chabad Chayil, Inc.. Motions referred to Judge Edwin G. Torres. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 3/12/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Requiring Discovery and Scheduling Conference and Order Referring Discovery Matters to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 3/12/2020. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Chabad Chayil, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Stok, Robert)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to The School Board of Miami-Dade County Florida. (drz)
|
|
Filing 2
Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12588334, filed by Chabad Chayil, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Summon(s), #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stok, Robert)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
