Strege v. Federal Prison Industries Inc. Food Service Directors et al
| Adam Strege |
| Doctor Feldman, Meranda, Troacher, Vivianne Marie Marrero-Torres, A Diez, Jesus Hernandez, Federal Prison Industries Inc. Food Service Directors, Warden, Eric A. Vos, "FDC" Miami Federal Detention Center, Ms. Austin, Victor J. Gonzalez-Bothwell, G. Fernandez, Bureau of Prison Central Office Directors, "MDC" Metropolitan Detention Center and Food Service Director |
| 1:2020cv21162 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Robert N Scola |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #13 Plaintiff's construed motion for reconsideration. For the reasons previously stated, reconsideration is denied. See [ECF Nos. 11; 12]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid (bca)
|
| Filing 13 OBJECTION of Magistrate Judge 12 Order. (kpe) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #8 Motion for jury trial as premature. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid (bca)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #9 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff can presently pay the filing fee, and he his new allegations do not refute his previous sworn statements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid (bca)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 and Summons by Adam Strege. Responses due by 5/5/2020 (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kpe) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re 4 Paperless Order by Adam Strege. (kpe) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Jury Demand by Adam Strege. (kpe) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File 200 Pages of Administrative Remedy Forms by Adam Strege. (drz) Modified on 4/9/2020 (drz). (Blank Summons Mailed) |
| Filing 6 Letter to the Court from Adam Strege. Copy of docket sheet mailed to Defendant. (kpe) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Add Three Laws to the Front Page of Compliant, 42USC 1983,1985, 1986 re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens,, by Adam Strege. (drz) |
| Set Deadlines Per DE#4. Filing Fee due by 4/14/2020. (cqs) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Based on his sworn statements, Plaintiff can afford the $400 filing fee upfront. Failure to pay the filing fee on or before April 14, 2020 shall result in a recommendation for dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid (bca)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Strege. (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (cds) Text Modified on 3/17/2020 (cds). |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against "FDC" Miami Federal Detention Center, "MDC" Metropolitan Detention Center, Austin, Bureau of Prison Central Office Directors, A Diez, Federal Prison Industries Inc. Food Service Directors, Feldman, G. Fernandez, Food Service Director, Victor J. Gonzalez-Bothwell, Jesus Hernandez, Vivianne Marie Marrero-Torres, Meranda, Troacher, Eric A. Vos, Warden. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Adam Strege. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memorandum Opinion and Order, #3 Summon(s))(cds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
