Hendrix-Smith v. Santander Consumer USA
Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith |
Santander Consumer USA, PRA Receivable Management and PRA Receivable Management doing business as Portfolio Recovery |
1:2020cv22254 |
June 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 Objections to PRA Receivables Opposition to re #23 MOTION for Hearing MOTION for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (drz) |
Filing 27 NOTICE that Defendant PRA Receivables has not sent Clear Title by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith (drz) |
Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #23 MOTION for Hearing MOTION for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by PRA Receivable Management. Replies due by 7/28/2020. (Gaset, John) |
Filing 25 NOTICE Re: Possible Car Tittle Fraud by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (drz) |
Filing 24 NOTICE of Potential Criminal Activity Provided by Arkansas DMV/Case by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (drz) |
Filing 23 Request for Motion to Set Request Hearing and MOTION for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (drz) |
Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint filed by PRA Receivable Management. (Gaset, John) |
Filing 21 NOTICE Re: POTENTIAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY PROVIDED BY ARKANSAS DMV by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (drz) |
Filing 20 Objection to defendants motion to dismiss re #10 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint ; #8 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS 1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Santander Consumer USA filed by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. Replies due by 7/7/2020. (drz) Modified on 7/1/2020 (mr1). |
Filing 19 Objection to re #8 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. Replies due by 7/7/2020. (drz) |
Filing 18 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 16 Response in Opposition to Motion,. Correction Other. Docketed in Error. (drz) |
Filing 17 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 15 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction - Chambers and Clerks. Document Restricted Due to Error; The correct document has been attached to this notice. (drz) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 16 [respm] restricted/sealed until further notice. (drz) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 15 [notice] restricted/sealed until further notice. (drz) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 14 [respm] restricted/sealed until further notice. (drz) |
Filing 13 NOTICE by PRA Receivable Management, Santander Consumer USA re 5 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,, (Gaset, John) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Eric Sickles on behalf of PRA Receivable Management. Attorney Robert Eric Sickles added to party PRA Receivable Management(pty:dft). (Sickles, Robert) |
Filing 11 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Santander Consumer USA (Solano, Sara) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint by PRA Receivable Management. Attorney John Philip Gaset added to party PRA Receivable Management(pty:dft). Responses due by 7/2/2020 (Gaset, John) |
Filing 9 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Pretrial Deadlines Pending Adjudication of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Santander Consumer USA. Responses due by 7/2/2020 (Solano, Sara) |
Filing 8 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Santander Consumer USA. Responses due by 7/2/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Solano, Sara) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sara L. Solano on behalf of Santander Consumer USA. Attorney Sara L. Solano added to party Santander Consumer USA(pty:dft). (Solano, Sara) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Discovery: Evidence by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith.(drz) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi) |
Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: ginahendrix@hotmail.com (cds) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PRA Receivable Management, Santander Consumer USA. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Edgina T. Hendrix-Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.