Lucius v. Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff: Windy Lucius
Defendant: Autozone, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv22373
Filed: June 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Federico A Moreno
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 7/31/2020. See attached document for full details. (mmc)
July 15, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Autozone, Inc. (DeBoe, Paul)
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint. Answer due 7/15/2020. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Windy Lucius. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/30/2020. (mmc)
June 26, 2020 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Autozone, Inc.. Attorney Paul J DeBoe added to party Autozone, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeBoe, Paul)
June 11, 2020 Filing 7 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Windy Lucius (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A- Notice of Dismissal of prior litigation, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B- Explanation from digital accessibility expert) (Cunningham, Juan)
June 11, 2020 Filing 6 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Windy Lucius identifying Other Affiliate ADASure for Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan)
June 11, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Windy Lucius. Autozone, Inc. served on 6/10/2020, answer due 7/1/2020. (Cunningham, Juan)
June 9, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Autozone, Inc.. (ebz)
June 9, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ebz)
June 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against Autozone, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13003833, filed by Windy Lucius. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cunningham, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucius v. Autozone, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Autozone, Inc.
Represented By: Paul J DeBoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Windy Lucius
Represented By: Juan Courtney Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?