Cayunda v. U.S. Attorney General et al
Clovis Cortez Cayunda |
U.S. Attorney General, Secretary D.H.S. and Immigration & Customs Enforcement |
1:2020cv22598 |
June 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Jose E Martinez |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 PAPERLESS Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid/Case Closed by the District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 8/21/2020. (br) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, denying as moot #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Clovis Cortez Cayunda ; Adopting #9 Report and Recommendations. Certificate of Appealability: DENIED Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 8/20/2020. See attached document for full details. (pcs) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 28 USC 2241 case re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Clovis Cortez Cayunda; Recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] be DISMISSED AS MOOT and this case be CLOSED by the Clerk of Court. Objections to R&R due by 9/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 8/19/2020. See attached document for full details. (br) |
Filing 8 FIRST Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re 3 Clerks Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment, #5 Order Requiring Payment of Filing Fee or Filing IFP Motion, #6 Order to Show Cause, #4 Order of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant. US Mail returned for: Clovis Cortez Cayunda. The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two undeliverable notices from the Court, notices will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (mp) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #6 Order to Show Cause, by Immigration & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Attorney General, Secretary D.H.S.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Executed Warrant of Removal)(Raurell, Carlos) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: the Respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this petition should not be granted and shall file therewith all documents and transcripts necessary for the resolution of this petition. Show Cause Response due by 8/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (br) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT. Filing Fee due by 8/30/2020. Motions due by 8/30/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (br) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/30/2020. See attached document for full details. (br) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2 for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (vjk) Modified file date on 7/29/2020 (vjk). |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. (jbs) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00, No IFP was Filed or Filing Fee Paid, filed by Clovis Cortez Cayunda. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(jbs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.