Noble v. JPAY Securus Technologies Company
| Clarence Dwayne Noble |
| JPAY Securus Technologies Company |
| 1:2020cv22696 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's #9 Motion to Amend Complaint and Submit Exhibit. The Amended Complaint submitted with the Motion fails to state a claim and is deficient for the same reasons noted in the Court's #10 Order on the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (jsi)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice. This action is CLOSED for administrative purposes. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 7/28/2020. See attached document for full details. (scn)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 by Clarence Dwayne Noble. Responses due by 8/5/2020. (scn) |
| Filing 8 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction re 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment. Incorrect Magistrate Judge Selected; Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid no longer assigned to case. Corrected by the Clerk. (jc) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel signed by: Clarence D. Noble re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Clarence Dwayne Noble (pcs) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Clarence Dwayne Noble. (pcs) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for the Appointment of Counsel by Clarence Dwayne Noble. Responses due by 7/14/2020 (pcs) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of Support re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens by Clarence Dwayne Noble. (pcs) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Dwayne Noble. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid no longer assigned to case. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pcs) Modified text on 7/7/2020 (jc). |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against JPAY Securus Technologies Company. Filing fee $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Clarence Dwayne Noble.(pcs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Noble v. JPAY Securus Technologies Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPAY Securus Technologies Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clarence Dwayne Noble | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
