Ariza v. Soaring Wings, LLC
| Victor Ariza |
| Soaring Wings, LLC and Soaring Wings, LLC a florida limited liability company doing business as Winghouse Bar & Grill |
| 1:2020cv22788 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to ARC Winghouse LLC. (lbc) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Victor Ariza re #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal filed by Victor Ariza (Duran, Pelayo) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's AMENDED COMPLAINT against ARC Winghouse LLC filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Victor Ariza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Hannah, Roderick) |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Plaintiff's #6 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The stay is temporarily lifted for the limited purposes of (1) allowing Plaintiff to file and serve his Amended Complaint and (2) permitting Defendant to file its responsive pleading. Plaintiff shall file his Amended Complaint on or before September 2, 2020. The case shall remain administratively closed in accordance with the Court's 4 Order. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Victor Ariza. Responses due by 9/11/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Victor Ariza. Soaring Wings, LLC served on 7/13/2020, answer due 8/3/2020. (Duran, Pelayo) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER. This case presents an issue currently under review by the Eleventh Circuit in Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Gil, No. 17-13467--specifically, whether a website is subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act as a public accommodation. Upon a sua sponte review of the record, the Court finds that this case shall be STAYED and CLOSED for administrative purposes pending the Eleventh Circuit's resolution of Winn-Dixie. The parties shall file a joint status report with the Court within 90 days of the date of this Order and every 90 days thereafter indicating whether the stay should be lifted. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Soaring Wings, LLC. (pcs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Soaring Wings, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13140828, filed by Victor Ariza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Duran, Pelayo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
