Lucius v. MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC
| Windy Lucius |
| MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC |
| 1:2020cv22935 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Federico A Moreno |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Complaint. Answer due 9/8/2020. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Windy Lucius. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 7/31/2020. (mmc)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC. Attorney Kevin M. Young added to party MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Young, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Windy Lucius. MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC served on 7/17/2020, answer due 8/7/2020. (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 5 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Windy Lucius identifying Other Affiliate ADASure for Windy Lucius (Cunningham, Juan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Federico A. Moreno. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13191523, filed by Windy Lucius. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cunningham, Juan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lucius v. MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MOD Super Fast Pizza, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kevin M. Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Windy Lucius | |
| Represented By: | Juan Courtney Cunningham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
