Vergara v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Dianelin M Vergara
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv22964
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Edwin G Torres
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Williams
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul. (nc)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Dianelin M Vergara. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 7/29/2020. (EGT)
July 21, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes on behalf of Dianelin M Vergara. Attorney Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes added to party Dianelin M Vergara(pty:pla). (Palacios-Paredes, Katherine)
July 20, 2020 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending (drz)
July 17, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dianelin M Vergara. (drz)
July 17, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kathleen M. Williams and Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (drz)
July 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Dianelin M. Vergara against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Dianelin M Vergara. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Forma Pauperis Affidavit, #3 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Oliver, Rogelio)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vergara v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dianelin M Vergara
Represented By: Rogelio Ramon Oliver
Represented By: Katherine Olivia Palacios-Paredes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?