CRUZ v. SAUL
| ALEXANDER CRUZ |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 1:2020cv23220 |
| August 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Lauren Fleischer Louis |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by ALEXANDER CRUZ. ALEXANDER CRUZ served on 8/24/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service - Attorney General of the US, #2 Affidavit of Service - Office of the General Counsel, SSA, #3 Proof of Service)(Bohr, Sarah) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 9/3/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, by serving U.S. Attorney General (lk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) to replace incorrect proposed Summons filed herein for the Attorney General of the United States by ALEXANDER CRUZ re #3 Summons Issued as to USA (Bohr, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s))(jbs) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom and Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jbs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13289074, filed by ALEXANDER CRUZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) - U.S. Attorney's Office, #3 Summon(s) - Office of General Counsel, #4 Summon(s) - Attorney General of the United Statesey of)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Bohr, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CRUZ v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ALEXANDER CRUZ | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Harriet Bohr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
