Williams v. The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida
| Robert Williams |
| The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida |
| 1:2020cv23238 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Alicia M Otazo-Reyes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER SETTING CIVIL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: ( Jury Trial set for 8/2/2021 before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Calendar Call set for 7/28/2021 09:30 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles., Status Conference set for 5/19/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for all discovery matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 8/21/2020. See attached document for full details. (pcs) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 7 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida identifying Corporate Parent Christopher J La Piano, Corporate Parent Alberto M. Carvalho, Corporate Parent Michele Jones, Corporate Parent Walter J. Harvey for The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida (La Piano, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Joint Proposed Scheduling Order)(La Piano, Christopher) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for all pretrial non-dispositive and dispositive matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before August 20, 2020, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (bfk) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-13294233, filed by The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Composite Exhibit A)(La Piano, Christopher)State Court Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed. Modified on 8/4/2020 (pcs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida | |
| Represented By: | Christopher James La Piano |
| Represented By: | Michele Lara Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
